Venezuela

Since 2015, Venezuela has been experiencing a complex humanitarian emergency that affects access to food, health, basic services and human mobility, while at the same time there has been a rapid deterioration of civic and democratic space. The political context is marked by high polarisation, institutional conflicts and limitations on citizen participation.

Since 2024, the country has been going through a delicate period due to the controversial presidential elections in July of that year, which were marked by a lack of transparency, repression and international isolation, which has deepened the human rights crisis.

The context described above has led to unprecedented migration in the region. It is estimated that almost 8 million people have left Venezuela, of whom almost 7 million have been taken in by Latin American countries such as Colombia and Peru.

Mobility remains one of the key focuses of the humanitarian response programme in the country, as it is one of the markers of vulnerability. Migrants face protection risks due to the conditions in which mobility occurs. Venezuelan migrants are mostly young people between the ages of 15 and 49, the majority of whom are men. The reasons for migration are the search for better living conditions and, to a lesser extent, family reunification. 

These mobility figures have had a significant impact on civic space in Venezuela, as the young and productive population has been reduced, which has a direct impact on active and dynamic participation in the public sphere, reducing social cohesion and community participation in relevant issues such as political and social rights.

In this context, civic space has faced new challenges. The Law on the Control, Regularisation, Operation and Financing of NGOs and Similar Organisations (NGO Law) introduces strict controls on the operation and financing of social organisations, with provisions that could limit their autonomy and operability. International organisations, as well as international protection mechanisms such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela have warned about these measures.

For its part, the draft Law against Fascism, Neo-Fascism and Similar Expressions, approved in its first reading in April 2024, has raised concerns due to its ambiguous wording, the breadth of its sanctions and its possible use to restrict legitimate expressions of opinion and public action. During its discussion in the National Assembly, several United Nations rapporteurs sent communications to the Venezuelan government expressing their concern about the bill, due to its potential danger of restricting human rights such as freedom of expression, and urging a review of the text.

Similarly, various organisations have documented legal and administrative actions taken against organisations, human rights defenders and social activists, especially after the presidential elections in July 2024. These actions have included attacks, court summonses, restrictions on mobility, stigmatisation campaigns and an increase in arbitrary detentions, which have raised concerns among national and international organisations.

Finally, it is worth mentioning that, in July 2025, the National Assembly agreed to declare the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Turk, persona non grata and requested the permanent closure of the Office established in Venezuela, which has also suffered in the recent past from tensions between the government and human rights protection mechanisms.

Despite these conditions, Venezuelan civil society remains active, deploying initiatives in defence of human rights, humanitarian assistance, monitoring of public policies and community strengthening, maintaining its commitment to the promotion of an informed and participatory citizenry.

Subscribe here and receive the latest alerts and updates of Venezuela

Snapshots

Country snapshots capture the current state of the enabling environment for civil society and provide a quick overview of significant events and trends that have occurred over the past 4 months. Click on a component in the timeline to see the corresponding Enabling Environment Snapshot.

Alerts

The Early Warning Mechanism documents changes and critical trends in the enabling environment for civil society. The mechanism works by information-gathering work focusing on events that impact the enabling environment. The EU SEE consortium assess these events to trigger alerts indicating a downward or upward trend in the enabling environment.

Español English Español English

Excarcelaciones sin libertad plena en Venezuela: avances limitados y persistencia de restriccionesEl 8 de enero 2026, el Presidente de la Asamblea Nacional declaró ante medios nacionales que como gesto para la unión y convivencia pacífica, el gobierno decidió la excarcelación de un número importante de personas detenidas (venezolanas y extranjeras), sin especificar la cantidad o quienes serían las personas beneficiadas.Posterior al anuncio, algunas excarcelaciones se materializaron, no obstante, en cifras muy bajas y el proceso ha sido muy lento, lo que ha ocasionado angustia entre familiares que han realizdo vigilias y manifestaciones en diversos centros de reclusión del país y otros lugares.Asimismo, otro punto a destacar es que estas medidas son excarcelaciones, y no se tratan de libertad plena, ya que aún persisten sobre estas personas medidas cautelares que limitan su libertad o procesos penales sin cerrar.Entre los nombres de las personas que recibieron estas medidas se encuentran la defensora de derechos humanos, Rocío San Miguel, quien se encontraba privada de libertad de forma arbitraria desde febrero de 2024, el dirigente político y ex candidato presidencial Enrique Márquez, el político Nicmer Evans y el periodista Roland Carreño, entre varios de los nombres destacados.El caso defensora Rocío San Miguel sirve para reflejar las condiciones en las que se otorgan estas medidas, ya que sobre ella se mantienen medidas cautelares que le prohíben hacer declaraciones públicas sobre su caso, información que fue confirmada por familiares, lo que confirma que se trata de excarcelaciones y no de libertad plena. Rocío San Miguel, luego de salir del centro de reclusión, se traslado a España, junto con otras personas españolas que se encontraban en la misma condición.El 12 de enero 2026 el Ministerio de Asuntos Penitenciarios, publicó un comunicado en el que daba cuenta de la excarcelación de 116 personas desde el 8 de enero, cifras que contrastan con las que manejan las organizaciones de derechos humanos en el país. En este sentido, las estimaciones de la sociedad civil indican que aproximadamente 72 personas han sido excarceladas hasta el 14 de enero de 2026.Estos eventos se han desarrollado luego de la extracción por medio de la acción militar estadounidense del presidente Nicolás Maduro, y que según ha sido declarado por los mismos voceros del gobierno, es una muestra de la voluntad por la reconciliación nacional. Ahora bien, las excarcelaciones no se traducen en libertad plena para las personas detenidas. Por su parte, la Misión Internacional Independiente de Determinación de los Hechos sobre Venezuela, publicó un comunicado que recoge la satisfacción por las medidas tomadas, pero que las mismas son insuficientes, haciendo un llamado a la liberación plena y tomar medidas para que las excarcelaciones se hagan de forma expedita y con apego a principios de derechos humanos.

Search

People searched for

Translate »