On 19 January 2026, the Guatemalan Nominating Commission began its functions to elect Magistrates and Alternate Magistrates of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal for the 2027 general elections. As part of this work, the Commission reviewed files, evaluations and internal votes, culminating in the integration of a list of 20 candidates, which was transferred to the Congress of the Republic on 17 February 2026 for the corresponding final election.
This process not only defines the composition of the highest authority in electoral matters, but also has a direct impact on the credibility, independence and transparency of future electoral processes. The new magistracy will have the responsibility of organizing, directing and supervising the 2027 general elections, guaranteeing conditions of legality, equity and legal certainty. In a context of fragile institutionality, this appointment is decisive in consolidating citizen confidence and protecting national democratic stability.
However, the process was marked by public questions regarding the transparency and objectivity of the Commission. At certain times, spaces for civil society observation were limited and access to relevant information was not provided, reducing the possibilities for effective participation. As a result, CSOs did not have all the information to effectively evaluate profiles and concerns raised by CSOs against some candidates were not duly considered. The final list includes many people that have been accused of anti-democratic practices and possible links to corruption and impunity. Different social sectors have expressed their rejection and concern about the formation of this list.
The lack of transparency in the process negatively impacts citizen participation as well as public confidence in the selection process and, therefore, in the future composition of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal. If the election falls mostly on profiles questioned for possible links to anti-democratic practices, corruption or impunity, the fragile democratic institutions are further weakened. This could have a negative impact on the credibility of the upcoming general elections in 2027 and on the stability of the electoral political system as a whole.
Civil society organizations have carried out political advocacy actions through public pronouncements in which transparency in the process and the election of suitable, independent magistrates with proven experience and no history of human rights violations have been demanded. These positions have sought to draw attention to the importance of guaranteeing a legitimate process in accordance with democratic principles.