On 3 June 2026, constitutional law scholar Feri Amsari was questioned by investigators from the Metro Jaya Regional Police following complaints filed in relation to remarks made during a public discussion titled “Before Observers are Published” held on 31 March 2026. The complaints, submitted on 16 and 17 April 2026 by separate parties, alleged incitement and were linked to criticism of government policies and public affairs. The examination reportedly lasted around four hours, during which investigators asked approximately 25 questions.
The case follows a series of recent incidents involving activists, academics, human rights defenders and public commentators who have faced legal complaints, intimidation and other forms of pressure after expressing criticism of government policies. These developments have generated concern among civil society organizations regarding the use of legal mechanisms against individuals exercising their right to freedom of expression and public participation.
The event occurs in a broader context of growing concerns about civic space in Indonesia, including debates surrounding the implementation of the new Criminal Code (KUHP), as well as statements by Prabowo Subianto indicating that government critics and public observers should be brought under greater oversight. Additional concerns have emerged following proposals to establish a government-led assessment mechanism to determine human rights defender status under the Ministry of Human Rights. Civil society organizations, including YLBHI, have called for parliamentary oversight in response to the case, urging the House of Representatives to exercise its supervisory function over relevant state institutions and for national rights bodies to strengthen protection for human rights defenders.
This has negative implications for Indonesia’s enabling environment, particularly regarding freedom of expression and civic participation. The investigation of a prominent academic for public criticism may discourage open debate on matters of public interest and increase concerns about the criminalization of dissent. Journalists, researchers, human rights defenders and civil society organizations may be affected if similar legal actions become more frequent. The case also raises broader concerns about the ability of civil society actors to engage in policy advocacy and public oversight without fear of legal repercussions.